Bragno v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Bland, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
Tbe merchandise involved in this appeal was classified by tbe collector at tbe port of Chicago under paragraph 749 of tbe Tariff Act of 1922 and assessed with duty at 35 per centum ad valorem. Tbe importers protested said classification and assessment of duty and claimed it dutiable as a nonenumerated manufactured article at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1459 of tbe same act.
Tbe United States Customs Court overruled tbe protests without approving tbe classification of tbe collector. Appellants have appealed to this court from tbe…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nix v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Robertson v. SalomonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- United States v. La MannaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. WallaceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Pierce v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.