Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Ivy H. Smith Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 3, 1939No. 27412, 27483Published

1Opinion of the CourtEelton, J.

1. The fact that an attorney or a party interested in the case wrote the answer of the magistrate to a writ of certiorari affords ground for an exception to the answer, but not for a motion to dismiss the certiorari. Kelly v. Young, 8 Ga. App. 551 (70 S. E. 27); Burruss-Manley Co. v. Lewis, 8 Ga. App. 552 (70 S. E. 27). It was error for the court to dismiss the certiorari on this ground.

2. Upon the hearing of a writ of certiorari, where it appeared from the evidence introduced in support of a motion to dismiss the writ that, between the time of the sanction of the certiorari and the time of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burruss-Manley Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. DeVane v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Kelly v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API