Smith v. C. I. T. Corp.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Chief Justice.
1. After a careful consideration of the record and the assignments of error, this court has reached the conclusion that the decision of the Court of Appeals is correct, except as to the construction placed upon the decision by this court in General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Coggins, 118 Ga. 643 (113 S. E. 841). The decision in the Coggins case does not mean that the holder of the contract, when suing in trover, is without any duty to account for the notes or other evidence of indebtedness, so as to show that the vendee will incur no further risk or *200liability…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Securities Trust Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Carter v. Spiegel, May Stern Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Baston v. RabunSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Commissioners of Thomas County v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Barbour v. Day Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bullock v. YoungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Kirkland v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- C. I. T. Corporation v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Altman v. Crown Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950