Legal Opinion
Dodds v. Pulte Home Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 28, 2006No. Nos. 3262 EDA 2005 and 3263 EDA 2005PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
KLEIN, J.:
¶ 1 This consolidated appeal arises out of two separate actions instituted by home-buyers against the builders and sellers of their homes. John F. and Patricia Dodds and Joseph and Amy Pórtale (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed suit against Pulte Home Corporation of the Delaware Valley (“PHCDV’), and its alleged parent corporation, Pulte Home Corporation (“PHC”) (collectively “Defendants”). PHC appeals from the trial court order denying Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment that requested the matter be remanded to arbitration. Defendants claim the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smay v. E.R. Stuebner, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Nealy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Shadduck v. Christopher J. Kaclik, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Quiles v. Financial Exchange Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Highmark Inc. v. Hospital Service Ass'n of Northeastern PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Elwyn v. DeLucaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Sanford v. Bracewell & Guiliani, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Lincoln Griswold v. Coventry First LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Donald White v. Sunoco IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Provenzano, D. v. Ohio Valley General Hosp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.