Legal Opinion

Jane Kieffer v. Sears, Roebuck & Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1989No. 88-3473PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Jane Kieffer appeals from the judgment of the district court adopting the report and recommendation of a special master and granting summary judgment for defendant Sears, Roebuck & Company in this employment discrimination case brought under Title YII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Appellant argues, inter alia, that the district court erred in adopting the special master’s report and recommendation without holding a hearing. For the following reasons, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand for a hearing.

I

Appell…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Wonderbowl, Inc., a California Corporation, Debtor. Caruso Enterprises, Inc. v. A. J. Bumb, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. In the Matter of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor. Appeal of the State of Wisconsin, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Goodrich Corp. v. Town of MiddleburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. Goodrich Corp. v. Town Of MiddleburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Banks v. BanksMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Wallace v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  5. Stewart v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API