Legal Opinion

Phillips v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 10, 1967No. 684 MPublishedCited by 14 opinions

Mise.

1Per curiam

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The •judgment is reversed. Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Black and'Mr. Justice Clark are of the opinion that the judgment should be vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, supra. Mr. Justice Harlan would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in Chapman v. California, supra, at 45.

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. De SantiagoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Hartley Marine Corp. v. MierkeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Southern Pacific Equipment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Rice Growers' Ass'n of California v. County of YoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API