Legal Opinion
Mamula v. McCulloch
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1969No. Civ. 32349PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRAMPTON, J. pro tern. *
During the year 1962, defendant commenced construction of a convalescent hospital, to be known as the Parkcrest Convalescent Hospital, on real property owned by him in the City of Fullerton, California. The hospital neared completion about November 1962.
The real property upon which the hospital was being constructed was encumbered by a first deed of trust securing a promissory note in the approximate amount of $180,000, and by a second deed of trust securing a promissory note in the approximate amount of $41,000. The note secured by the second deed of trust contained…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parr-Richmond Industrial Corp. v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- In Re Estate of DwyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- In Re Estate of DwyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Honey v. Henry's Franchise Leasing Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Harper v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Storage Services v. OosterbaanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Rogers v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Horine v. Greencastle Production Credit Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Lang v. KlingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Brown & Bryant, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.