United States v. Rodriguez
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
The main issue in this appeal is whether the prying by a former bureaucrat is criminal: that is, whether the defendant violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which prohibits “intentionally accessing] a computer without authorization or ex-eeed[ing] authorized access, and thereby obtaining] ... information from any department or agency of the United States.” 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2)(B). Roberto Rodriguez, a former employee of the Social Security Administration, appeals his conviction for violating the Act on the grounds that he did not exceed his authorized access to his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. IreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. John Kevin TalleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- LVRC HOLDINGS LCC v. BrekkaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Damon AmedeoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Van Buren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- United States v. NosalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Hiq Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Dylan StanleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. ValleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.