Legal Opinion

Bausman v. Dixon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 20, 1899No. 197PublishedCited by 12 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller

Dixon brought an action in the Superior Court of King County, "Washington, against Bausman, receiver of the Kanier Power and Railway Company, to, recover damages for injuries sustained by reason of defendant’s negligence. The complaint, alleged that the Ranier Power and Railway Company ivas a corporation organized under the laws of Washington, and engaged in operating a certain street railway in the city of Seattle; that June 13, 1893, one Backus was duly appointed by the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Washington, receiver of the company, and qualified and served as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Capital National Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gableman v. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Pope v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Baggs v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Matarazzo v. HustisDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1919
  5. Gableman v. Peoria, D. & E. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API