Pantazatos v. Jelm

This is an action in which plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, sued the defendant to recover damages for an alleged malpractice. The verdict of the jury and judgment of the court were for the defendant.

The principal error complained of, and set out in the brief, and noticed in oral argument, is in regard to the charge of court.

At the request of plaintiff, the court charged before argument as follows:

*259“You are instructed that a physician who offers his services to the public impliedly agrees with those who employ him that he possesses that reasonable degree of learning, skill and experience…