Legal Opinion

Feinsod v. Noon

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 14, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

272 N.J. Super. 248 (1994)

639 A.2d 750

MERYL FEINSOD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

JANEEN H. NOON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 22, 1994.

Decided April 14, 1994.

Before Judges MICHELS and SKILLMAN.

Kathryn J. Kingree argued the cause for appellant (Rand, Algeier, Tosti & Woodruff, attorneys; Robert B. Woodruff, of counsel; Ms. Kingree, on the brief).

Margaret M. Mitchell argued the cause for respondent (Farabaugh, Frieland & Smith, attorneys; Ms. Mitchell, of counsel and on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baumann v. MarinaroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Hodgson v. ApplegateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Rosa v. AraujoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  4. Last v. Audubon Park AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  5. Rosa v. AraujoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. COVERINGS & INSTALL., INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  2. A & M FARM v. Am. Sprinkler Mech.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  3. Chakravarti v. Pegasus Consulting Group, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  4. Klajman v. Fair Lawn EstatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  5. Rodriguez v. LucianoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API