Legal Opinion
United States v. Torres Maldonado
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 21, 1994No. 92-1849 through 92-1852PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-appellants challenge various aspects of their drug and firearms convictions, arguing, inter alia, that insufficient evidence supports their convictions, and that their motions for severance and for suppression of evidence were improperly denied. We reverse the firearms convictions of two defendants and affirm all other convictions.
/.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
For purposes of defendants’ challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence, we begin by reciting the facts in the light most favorable to the government. United States v. Mena-Robles, 4 F.3d…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Efraim Natanel A/K/A Efriam NatanelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- United States v. SpinneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Flores RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Luciano MosqueraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Martinez MolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. DeMasiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.