Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ellis v. Griggs

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 21, 1933No. 1 Div. 801PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN,. J.ustice.

This is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, instituted by the appellant, as authorized’ by the statute, section 9932, Code 1923, to restrain the appellee, who is the superintendent of education of Mobile county, from exercising the office of a member o'f the board of school commissioners for Mobile county, created by the act approved August 22, 1919, Loc. Acts 1919, pp. 73-75.

The appellee admits that he is performing the functions and exercising the powers of said office, and seeks to justify under the provisions of the local act of the General Assembly of Alabama,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Phœnix Assurance Co. v. Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Savage v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Davis & Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. City of Uniontown v. State ex rel. GlassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dixie Coaches, Inc. v. RamsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Birmingham Paper Co. v. CurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Harris v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Hawley Fuel Corp. v. Burgess Mining & Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. White v. Board of Adjustment of City of BurminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API