Mahoney v. Friedberg
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of the city of Norfolk. Decree for defendants. Complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Keith, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
The bill in this case was filed by Mary R. Mahoney and others, residuary devisees of Edward Mahoney, making Solomon Friedberg and others defendants, and stating their case as follows: That the plaintiffs are seized of a fee simple estate in a parcel of land in the city of Norfolk, commencing on the west side of James street, now called Monticello avenue, and formerly known as Armistead road, or Armistead bridge road, at a point where the southern line of Lot No. 64 on the plat of the property of Edward Ma-honey, which is duly recorded in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Higinbotham v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Watson v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Board of Park Commissioners v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burdette v. BRUSH MOUNTAIN ESTATES, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
- Tidewater Area Charities, Inc. v. Harbour Gate Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- Robbins v. WalkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
- Kenneth M. Goldsmith v. David TidwellCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2025
- Smith v. BaileySupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.