Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pardue v. Brinegar

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 18, 2009No. COA08-1367Published

1DissentSteelman, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s analysis affirming the trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for directed verdict at the close of all of the evidence, and the denial of plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict after the trial.

A deed is to be construed by the court and not by the jury. WalMart Stores, Inc. v. Ingles Mkts., Inc., 158 N.C. App. 414, 417, 581 S.E.2d 111, 114 (2003) (quoting Elliott v. Cox, 100 N.C. 536, 538, 397 S.E.2d 319, 320 (1990)). “ ‘The language of the deed being clear and unequivocal, it must be given effect according to its terms, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Sherrod v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Ingles Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. County of Moore v. Humane Society of Moore County, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API