Legal Opinion

Village of Linndale v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1999No. 97-2493PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

This case turns on the question of whether R.C. 4549.17 is a general or a special law. If it is a general law, then it prevails over the local traffic laws of affected municipalities because a municipality’s police regulation must yield to the state’s general police regulation when the two conflict. If, however, R.C. 4549.17 is not a law applying to citizens generally, but an attempt to limit the powers of a municipal corporation to adopt or to enforce police regulations, it must be struck down as unconstitutional. Because R.C. 4549.17 is not a general law, we find it unconstitutional as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schneiderman v. SesansteinOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Village of West Jefferson v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Garcia v. Siffrin Residential Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Ohio Ass'n of Private Detective Agencies, Inc. v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Geauga County Board of Commissioners v. Munn Road Sand & GravelOhio Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Scott v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Canton v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Mendenhall v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Dayton v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API