Legal Opinion

In re Milchman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 2006PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on August 22, 1983. At all times relevant to this petition, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee now seeks an order, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.3, censuring respondent predicated upon similar discipline imposed by an order of the Supreme Court of Florida, dated September 1, 2005 (912 So 2d 319 [Fla 2005]), which approved an uncontested Referee’s report and consent judgment,…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re DranovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re AnschellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re LandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. In re FongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. In re DalleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re RoggeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re BallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. In re StahlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. In re MusmannoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. In re MilchmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API