Legal Opinion

Moore v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 1976No. 5614PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES, Justice.

This is a suit for declaratory judgment to construe three holographic codicils. The primary question before us is whether the latest codicil, that dated October 19,1974, is mandatory or precatory. The trial court held such codicil to be precatory. We hold the codicil to be mandatory and testamentary in nature, and therefore reverse and render the trial court’s judgment in this regard.

The plaintiffs in this suit were Walter H. Allen and Mary Jane Reagan, Independent Executors of the Estate of Lalla Branson, Deceased. The defendants were L. D. Moore (Appellant herein),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Frost National Bank of S.A.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Bergin v. BerginTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Wattenburger v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Welch v. RawlsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Finger v. School Sisters of the Third Order of St. FrancisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Finger v. SCHOOL SISTERS, ETC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Moore v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API