Legal Opinion

Galliers v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 11, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Monroe District Court. — Hon. T. ]VI. Bee, Judge. Action to recover the value of a horse alleged to have died on account of the negligence of the defendant. Trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the Court

Siierwin, J. —

1 The petition alleges the loss of a standard-bred trotting stallion through the negligence of the defendant in shipping the horse from Des Moines to A]bia in a car in which fresh lime had recently been carried. It was also averred that the horse was purchased by the plaintiff for breeding purposes, and that he was young, highly bred, and well-gaited. The defendant, in its answer, denied these allegations, and stated that the plaintiff traded for him an old horse, which he knew was of no value, and without seeing the stallion in question until his arrival at Albia. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gere v. Council Bluffs Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  2. Likes v. BaerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  3. Buford & Co. v. McGetchieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  4. Winch v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. Garnsey v. AllenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1847

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Ringer v. WilkinIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Motor Sales Corporation v. WisdomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API