Legal Opinion

Manget v. O'Neill

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. - Daniel Dillon, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

The defendant was the publisher ■of the Irish-American, a campaign sheet of limited cir*36culation, in which he inserted on October 25, 1890, the following publication of and concerning the plaintiff:

“Ered Manget, A Christian Confidence Man. His first appearance in St. Louis a betrayal of confidence and friendship.
“History: This fakir came to St. Louis upon a visit. In making the usual call upon the fraternity he dropped in to see the writer. After entertaining him, and dining him, and explaining the beauties of the business, Mr. Christian Manget departed. I supposed he had departed for his home…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terwilliger v. . WandsNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Harper v. Indianapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  3. Nelson v. MusgraveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
  4. Price v. WhitelySupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  5. Siebert v. Supreme Council of the Order of Chosen FriendsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morse v. Times-Republican Printing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Ukman v. Daily Record Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  3. Providence-Washington Ins. Co. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Ferguson v. Evening Chronicle Publishing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. State v. PowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API