Legal Opinion
Southampton Ass'n v. Planning Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 8, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Intervenor George G. Semerjian is the owner in fee of a parcel of real property consisting of 34 acres located in the Incorporated Village of Southampton. The property had been used as a working farm. It abuts Windmill Lane, Breese Lane and White Street. The easternmost portion of the property, consisting of about five acres, is improved with the historic Kendrick house and several outbuildings and is situated in the village’s OD *205Office Business District. The balance of the property is zoned “R-20” single-family residential, which zoning classification requires a minimum…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- H.O.M.E.S. v. New York State Urban Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Town of Yorktown v. New York State Department of Mental HygieneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Cohalan v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- MATTER OF TOWN OF YORKTOWN v. New York State Dep't of Mental HygieneNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Cohalan v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Gottlieb v. Rye City Planning CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Weiss v. Planning BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Allen v. City of Poughkeepsie Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985