Chambers County Commission v. Chambers County Board of Education
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partStuart, Justice
I concur in the result reached by the per curiam opinion. However, I dissent from the rationale of that opinion, particularly from the following statement: “The essence of the Boards’ arguments is that the *108last sentence of Amendment No. 202 grants the Boards the substantive five-mill taxing power granted to the county governing body by the first sentence of Amendment No. 202 and that, therefore, the Boards can invoke Amendment No. 202 for the purpose of calling an election and levying the five-mill tax.” 852 So.2d at 106. I also dissent from the statement that “§ 16-13-180 and § 16-13-181 ...…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morgan County Commission v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Folsom v. WynnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- State v. VaughanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
- Geneva County Com'n. v. TiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Freeman v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.