Legal Opinion · Dissent
Allgood v. Spearman
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 26, 1923No. 11257Published
1DissentJustice Cothran
(dissenting) : Action for foreclosure of a mortgage. The contest is between the mortgagor, W. D. Spearman, and the purchaser of the land from him, R. G. Sheclc, and involves the liability of' the purchaser for the deficiency judgment-entered up after sale. The undisputed facts are these:
On January 1, 1920, one E. F. Allgood sold and. conveyed to the defendant, W. D. Spearman, certain land in Anderson County, four tracts consisting of 282 acres; Spearman paid a part of the purchase money and gave Allgood 5 notes, $5,203.87 each, payable respectively January 1, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924 and 1925,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Metropolitan Bank v. St. Louis Dispatch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Elliott v. SackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Shepherd v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Belmont v. . ComanNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Fiske v. TolmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.