Craig v. State

Shulman, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of theft by receiving stolen property (OCGA § 16-8-7), consisting of a computer, its printer, and a clock. In his appeal, appellant questions the sufficiency of the evidence and several of the evidentiary rulings made by the trial court.

1. The items were taken during a burglary of a Statesboro, Georgia, business. The computer components were recovered in Miami, Florida, and the clock was found when police searched the *7home of appellant’s girl friend. The owner of the stolen goods identified the recovered items as the ones taken from his office.…