Legal Opinion
Rodgers Development Co. v. Town of Tilton
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 3, 2001No. 99-662PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The plaintiff, Rodgers Development Company (Rodgers), and intervenor Infinity Sherwood Properties, L.P. (Infinity) appeal the order of the Superior Court (McHugh, J.) affirming the decision of the Tilton Board of Selectmen conditionally laying out two roads across their property. See RSA 231:34 (1993). We affirm.
The following facts were found by the trial court or appear in the record before us. Rodgers, Infinity and intervenor Market Basket, Inc. (Market Basket) own abutting property in the commercial district of the defendant, Town of Tilton (town), in the vicinity of Route 3 and Exit 20 of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Merrill v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Dudley v. CilleySuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1832
- V.S.H. Realty, Inc. v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Jackson v. RaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Wolfeboro Neck Property Owners Ass'n v. Town of WolfeboroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Town of Hinsdale v. Town of ChesterfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2010
- Green Crow Corp. v. Town of New IpswichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- State v. KOREAN METHODIST CHURCHSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.