Legal Opinion

Stanford v. City of Manchester

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 26, 2000No. A00A1704PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Cedric Jerome Stanford sued the City of Manchester and Dixie Cole, a Manchester police officer, for false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, violations of 42 USC § 1983, and slander. These claims arise out of Stanford’s assertion that he was wrongfully arrested for rape. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants, and Stanford appeals. We affirm.

In reviewing grants of summary judgment, “this court conducts a de novo review of the law and the evidence.” To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Desai v. Silver Dollar City, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Desmond v. Troncalli MitsubishiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Pinkston v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas Bruce Henley v. Todd PayneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Pourreza v. Teel Appraisals & Advisory, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Cooper-Bridges v. IngleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Mohamud v. Wachovia Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Martinet v. WainrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API