Legal Opinion

State v. White

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 17, 1994No. 930696-CAPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIS, Judge:

Appellant, Theodis White, Jr., claims that the trial court erred in its application of Utah Rule of Evidence 403 by admitting into evidence the blood-stained clothing of the individual he stabbed. We agree that the prejudicial effect of the introduction of the clothing substantially outweighed any probative value, but hold that the trial court’s error was harmless.

FACTS

At approximately 1:00 a.m. on May 23, 1993, David Egleston, Paul Keenan, and Kevin Barney were driving eastbound on 800 South in Salt Lake City. After Egleston moved into the left-hand turn lane to turn onto…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BlubaughCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  2. State v. AlonzoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  3. State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  4. State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  5. State v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API