Legal Opinion
Ellison v. Conoco, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided June 19, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 85-657PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
MENTZ, District Judge.
The issue before the Court is whether Associated Oilfield Services, Inc. (Associated) had custody of the snubbing unit involved in plaintiffs accident for purposes of La. Art. 2317 liability. The Court previously granted summary judgment in favor of Associated because there was no evidence that it had anything to do with the operations or instrumentalities involved in plaintiffs accident.
Plaintiff subsequently moved to vacate the dismissal of Associated and for rehearing of Associated’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that newly discovered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ross v. La Coste De MontervilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Detillier v. Scafco, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Lucas v. DevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Mary S. Blansit, Wife Of/leslie G. Blansit v. Hyatt Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ellison v. Conoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Brian Lee Ellison, Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Intervenor-Appellant v. Conoco, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Appellant v. Associated Oilfield Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992