Legal Opinion

In re Fishman

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1952No. Crim. No. 846PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Petitioner recited in his application that he was on bail pending the trial of the action against him, and after his conviction by a jury of a felony, he was committed to the county jail; that pending his motion for a new trial he applied to the trial court for bail pending his contemplated appeal and that this request was denied.

This application for a writ of habeas corpus is predicated upon a statement of petitioner of his immediate need of insulin treatment, proper diet, and radium treatments for a cancerous condition of the nasal passage, and that if such request is not granted, his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re FishmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. People v. PantagesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. People v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. In Re FishmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API