Kitt v. Yakima County
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.
This case arose as a tort action for damages sustained by the plaintiff in an automobile collision which occurred at an obscured intersection in Yakima County. The plaintiff alleged that the county had negligently signed 1 the intersection. We reverse the Court of Appeals, Division Three, and reinstate the judgment for the plaintiff against the County because the trial court was correct in ruling that the County was negligent as a matter of law in its manner of signing the intersection.
I
Plaintiff Vernon Kitt and Dale Stanton, against whom plaintiff dismissed his claim before this action came…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schneider v. Yakima CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by14 opinions
- Owen v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Owen v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Mathis v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Cyr v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Wojcik v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.