Legal Opinion

Worthem v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 28, 2002No. CR 01-1207PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

P ER Curiam.

Appellant was convicted of committing rape by engaging in deviate sexual activity with ano.ther person who was less than fourteen years of age. Fie was sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. On direct appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed. Worthem v. State, No. CACR 00-1021 (Ark. App., May 2, 2001) (unpublished). The mandate issued May 22, 2001.

On July 3, 2001, Appellant filed a petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37. The State moved for dismissal of the petition, asserting that it was not verified pursuant to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Carey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boyle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Nelson v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Shaw v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API