Legal Opinion

Gallup Electric Light Co. v. Pacific Improvement Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1911No. 1217PublishedCited by 2 opinions

No briefs on motion to retax costs. Appeal from District Court (for McKinley County, before Iba A. Abbott, Associate Justice. Execution recalled, costs ordered retaxed and motion of appellee denied.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT.

ROBERTS, A. J.

1 In the opinion in this case, heretofore handed down at this term, the judgment of the lower court was reversed and no specific order was made as to the costs. The Clerk of the Supreme Court issued executions for costs accruing- in this court, and also for all costs that had accrued in the district court from the inception of the cause. The appellee has filed a motion for an order staying the enforcement of costs, because no .specific order was made in that regard. In the case of King v. Tabor, 15 N. M. 488; 110 Pac. 601, this court held that the provisions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. King v. TaborNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  2. White v. ClevengerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API