Woodmen of World Life Insurance Society v. Counts
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentWard, J.
I can not agree with the majority opinion herein for the reasons set out below.
Eegardless of what view one may take of the case, I take it that appellees can win only on the ground of estoppel. Briefly, the facts that must be relied upon to constitute estoppel are as follows: The son [through his father] applied for a $1,000 insurance policy with double indemnity; appellant’s president sent out a form letter to the father stating the application had been approved, saying nothing about double indemnity; the form letter stated that the policy [certificate] would follow; the certificate did…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peoples National Bank v. Linebarger Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Lewin v. Telluride Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Nakdimen v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Gambill v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Schuman v. StevensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949