Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mayhew v. Wilder

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 11, 2001Published

1Concurrence

WILLIAM C. KOCH, Jr., J„

concurring.

I concur with the court’s conclusion that the members of the 101st General Assembly did not violate either Tenn. Const, art. I, § 19, Tenn. Const, art. II, § 22, or the Tennessee Open Meetings Act, TenmCode Ann. §§ 8-44-101, -108 (1993 & Supp. 2000), when certain committees and other groups of legislators held secret meetings during the 2000 legislative session to consider the state budget, the appropriations bill, and related revenue legislation. My purpose in filing this separate opinion is to emphasize three points. First, all departments of state…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Taylor v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Riggs v. BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Richardson v. Tennessee Board of DentistryTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Doe v. SundquistTennessee Supreme Court · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API