Legal Opinion

Lathrope v. Flood

California Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1902No. S.F. No. 1703PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The plaintiffs are husband and wife, and seek hereby to recover damages from the defendant for injuries sustained by the plaintiff Margaret, by reason of the acts and conduct of the defendant towards her at the time of her confinement. The defendant is a physician, and had been engaged by the wife to attend her upon that occasion. Upon being summoned to her residence therefor, he found the case to be somewhat complicated, and that it would be necessary to make use of instruments for the purpose of removing the child from the mother. Upon inserting the instruments for this purpose the mother…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hanks v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Whitman v. SteigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Scripps Clinic v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Harrington v. HaddenIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Short v. FrinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Lee v. DewbreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Payton v. WeaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API