Home Industry Iron Works v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*1270OPINION.
Muedock:
This Board is slow to reject the opinion of a corporation’s directorate as to the reasonableness of salaries. However, when the Commissioner has determined that a salary is unreasonable a certain burden of proof rests upon the petitioner to overcome the presumption in favor of the Commissioner’s determination. *1271The determination herein denies the reasonableness of the salary of $3,900 paid to Mrs. Mary Kling in each of the years 1919 and 1920. The payment of such a salary to a woman 72 years old, who was merely a director giving occasional advice, is, to say the least,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Proctor v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
- Astorian-Budget Publishing Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
- Chesapeake Mfg. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
- Home Indus. Iron Works v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
- L. Schepp Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.