Legal Opinion

Philpot v. Philco-Ford Corp

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1974No. Civ. A. No. 73-884PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HIGGINBOTHAM, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is a motion for sanctions lodged by defendant pursuant to Rule 37(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant moves for the dismissal of plaintiffs’ action and the assessment against plaintiffs of reasonable attorney’s fees and a court reporter’s fee. The motion to dismiss is granted but only as to the named plaintiffs.

This suit was instituted as a class action under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Plaintiffs allege in their complaint that defendant, Philco-Ford…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Ferko v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
  3. Georgiadis v. First Boston Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  4. Michael v. HenryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Joselson v. Lockhart-Bright AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API