Legal Opinion · Dissent

National American Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria and Central Bank of Nigeria

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 30, 1979No. 43, Docket 78-7160Published

1DissentVan Graafeiland, Circuit Judge

Because my understanding of the law of reformation differs markedly from that of my colleagues, I must dissent.

*326Although the facts are somewhat complicated, they resolve themselves into a simple legal issue. The parties entered into written settlement agreements providing for payment of demurrage and cargo on twelve ships. The defendants believed that all twelve had reached Nigerian waters when in fact six of them had never sailed. Defendants’ mistaken belief was either induced or shared by the plaintiff. Under such circumstances, can the written agreements be reformed by reducing defendants’…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Metzger v. . &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,397 Lawrence J. Beecher v. Charles R. Able, and Four Other Actions, McDonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Elmer D. Russell, Elmer D. Russell, Cross-Appellant v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, a Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  4. Russell v. Shell Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. Schongalla v. HickeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API