Legal Opinion
(PC) Ardds v. Hicks
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 18, 2022No. 1:18-cv-01324Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE L. ARDDS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01324-JLT-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 13 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST 14 HICKS, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 69) 16 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 17 18 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 19 I. Background 20 Plaintiff Antoine L. Ardds (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 21 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.