Legal Opinion

Chevis v. Farm Bureau Insurance

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1974No. 4790Published

1Opinion of the Court

FRUGÉ, Judge.

MOTION TO DISMISS

The defendants — appellees Farm Bureau Insurance Companies, Arthur Daigle and Arthur W. Daigle move to dismiss the suspensive appeal of the plaintiff — appellant, Willie Chevis, on the grounds that the appellant’s appeal was not timely perfected. The appellees also move that in the event appellant’s appeal is not dismissed, it be declared devolutive rather than suspensive.

We deny appellees’ Motion to Dismiss, but order that the appellant’s appeal be considered devolutive rather than suspen-sive.

The record reveals that this was a tort suit arising out of an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Broussard v. AnnaloroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Kinchen v. KinchenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. J. I. Case Co. v. AplinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Bynog v. FertittaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API