State v. Mall

*64The opinion of the court was delivered by

DawsoN, J.:

The defendant was convicted on two counts of grand larceny and one count of petit larceny for specified thefts of goods from her employer, a dry-goods company in Clay Center.

Various errors are assigned; and it is argued in her behalf that her several abstractions of goods from her employer’s establishment were not larcenies bwt purchases on account; that if she was guilty of wrongdoing it was embezzlement and not larceny; knd she complains of the exclusion of evidence, and that the valúe of the goods was not properly proved.’

Noting these…