Legal Opinion
Goopal Digital Limited, et al. v. Fred Jin, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 22, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00857Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GOOPAL DIGITAL LIMITED, et al., Case No. 26-cv-00857-LJC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. COMPEL ARBITRATION; STAYING CASE, VACATING SEPTEMBER 24, 10 FRED JIN, et al., 2026 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, AND REQUIRING 11 Defendants. PERIODIC STATUS REPORTS 12 Re: Dkt. No. 43 13 14 Before the Court is Defendants Fred Jin, Brad Bao, Maren Schwarzer, Xin Jin, Martijn 15 Broersma, Francois Granade, Cerebellum Network, Inc., Interdata Network Ltd, and CEF AI 16 Inc.’s Petition to Compel Arbitration and Stay the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Fraser v. GoodaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.