Legal Opinion

Glockner v. Palace Amusement Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1920No. Civ. No. 3122PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lewis R. Works, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to recover certain unpaid monthly installments of money alleged to he due under a contract for the purchase by defendant from plaintiff of a motion picture orchestra.

Judgment went for defendant, from which plaintiff appeals.

For defense to the action defendant relied upon certain alleged fraudulent acts practiced by plaintiff, whereby defendant was induced, to enter into the contract, as to all of which the court found in defendant’s favor.

[1] It appears that prior to the institution of the action there had been another action between the same parties and upon the same contract to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Koehler v. Holt Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Wiese v. San Francisco Musical SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Baker v. Eilers Music Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Williams v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Minnich v. MinnichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API