Legal Opinion

Bemis v. Conley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1882PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Tuscola. Ejectment. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants in ejectment for lier dower interest in the estate of her deceased husband, who was a tenant in common with them, and recovered a judgment against them for the undivided one-third part of five-twelfths of the land in controversy.

The present proceeding is under a suggestion to recover mesne profits, and she recovered a judgment for $166.66, on which defendants bring error. It was conceded on the trial that she should recover this sum if any, and the chief defense is that she had no right of action at all.

"We do not see how this question can be raised on this record.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bemis v. ConleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API