Legal Opinion
People v. Espinoza
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided September 28, 2018No. E068282PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On October 29, 2012, a complaint charged defendant and appellant Edgar Espinoza with one count of possession of methamphetamine for sale under Health and Safety Code section 11378 ; on November 6, 2012, defendant pled guilty to the charge. The court suspended imposition of defendant's sentence and placed him on three years of formal probation with 220 days in local custody.
On May 3, 2013, defendant filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea under Penal Code section 10181 claiming that he was not advised of the immigration consequences of his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jae Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. Ogunmowo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Perez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. Camacho, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. VivarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
- People v. Mejia, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- In re Hernandez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Garcia v. Praxair Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.