Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. Heard

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 10, 1986No. 0631PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

This is an appeal in a partition and accounting action. We reverse.

Ackerman and Batson (the plaintiffs) together own a one-half interest in the subject 100-acre tract of land as tenants in common with Heard (the defendant).

The property was purchased for speculation by the defendant and plaintiffs’ father, their predecessor in title, in 1973. The defendant has been the sole occupant since the purchase of the land and has maintained a limited agricultural operation (livestock) on about 30 acres of the land. The plaintiffs and defendant had an understanding that the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wolf v. HayesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  2. SHUMAKER v. ShumakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Laughon v. O'BRAITISCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Parker v. ShecutCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API