Legal Opinion

State v. Escamilla

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2015No. S-14-698PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

- 181 - Nebraska A dvance Sheets 291 Nebraska R eports STATE v. ESCAMILLA Cite as

291 Neb. 181

State of Nebraska, appellee, v. M arcus M. Escamilla, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed June 19, 2015. No. S-14-698. 1. Criminal Law: Evidence: Appeal and Error. In reviewing a criminal conviction for a sufficiency of the evidence claim, whether the evidence is direct, circumstantial, or a combination thereof, the standard is the same: An appellate court does not resolve conflicts in the evidence, pass on the credibility of witnesses, or reweigh the evidence; such matters are for the finder of fact. 2.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Townes v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Stewart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
  4. State v. WattNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. IromuanyaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. OldsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. GolyarNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. CottonNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. BraeschNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. CasterlineNebraska Supreme Court · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API