Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Nicholson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 6, 1976No. 76-415PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOBSON, Acting Chief Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal by the defendant, State Farm, from a partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Carol M. Nicholson, for reimbursement of costs under her insurance contract incurred as a result of an accident.

Nicholson was injured in a traffic accident on December 3, 1974, when the police vehicle she was driving collided with an automobile. Nicholson then sought, pursuant to her insurance contract, reimbursement for costs in accordance with the personal injury protection (hereinafter PIP) benefits afforded under that contract. State Farm…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Womack v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of TennesseeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Le Croy v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Loftus v. Pennsylvania Life Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Brandal v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Florida Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co. v. PitzerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. O'KELLEYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LinkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Guthrie v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API