Harndon v. Stultz
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Story District Gowrt.— Hon. George W. Dyer, Judge. Action to recover possession of real estate and to quiet the title thereto, and for other relief. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. On hearing, the petition of plaintiff was dismissed, with costs, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
i. division une: evidence. The parties to this action are respectively the owners of adjoining farms in Story county. It appears that originally one Hillis owned the land comprising both farms, and that plaintiff purchased of him about thirty years before the time of the com*735mencement of this action. Defendant purchased about ten years later. Shortly after plaintiff effected his purchase, a survey of the division line was made, but the facts in respect thereto do not seem to have been ascertainable. However, it is conceded that, as between plaintiff and Hillis, a division of the line…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Miller v. Mills CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Axmear v. RichardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dake v. WardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Laughlin v. FrancisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Fredricksen v. BierentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Inman Manufacturing Co. v. American Cereal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Glaittli v. State of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.