Legal Opinion
Liberty Lincoln-Mercury v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 22, 1998No. 96-5762, 97-5189 and 97-5190UnknownCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) appeals from an order of the district court dated March 13, 1996, entered March 15, 1996, granting partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Liberty Lineoln-Mercury, Inc. (“Liberty”) on the grounds that Ford’s assessment of a dealer-parity surcharge (“DPS”) violated the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act, N.J. Stat. Ann. § 56:10-15(a) (West Supp.1997). Ford also appeals from the district court’s order of September 19, 1996, entered September 23, 1996, amending the March 13 order nunc pro…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lillian Kachmar v. Sungard Data Systems, Inc. Lawrence A. Gross Donna J. PedrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- J.F. Feeser, Inc. v. Serv-A-Portion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Albert L. Lawrence v. National Westminster Bank New Jersey, Albert LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Liberty Lincoln-Mercury v. Ford Motor Company, in No. 96-5762. Liberty Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company, in No. 97-5189. Liberty Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., in No. 97-5190 v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Christopher Smondrowski v. The Edgewood Company, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- GOLDEN FORTUNE IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION v. MEI-XIN LIMITEDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022